<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: White Hat SEO Vs. Black Hat SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.benh.org/blog/2007/05/white-hat-seo-vs-black-hat-seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.benh.org/blog/2007/05/white-hat-seo-vs-black-hat-seo/</link>
	<description>thoughts and rambling of BENEDICT HEROLD</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 23:57:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel Symes</title>
		<link>http://www.benh.org/blog/2007/05/white-hat-seo-vs-black-hat-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-71400</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel Symes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benh.org/blog/2007/05/white-hat-seo-vs-black-hat-seo/#comment-71400</guid>
		<description>Most link building by most SEO firms is not &quot;natural&quot; and is in fact blackhat according to Google. If you have to pay for it, ask for it, comment for it or insert a link in your article to gain it, then you are manipulating Google search results and Google terms that as blackhat. You just need to view the many video&#039;s by Matt Cutts to realize that if you are doing any of the above, then you are creating links manually and violating Google&#039;s TOS.

It simply baffles me how many SEO experts will quickly denounce Cloaking as &quot;unethical&quot; or against Google&#039;s TOS or even label it as spam which manipulates search results but then on a daily basis create artificial, manual or software generated backlinks for clients.

If you are distributing countless articles with links or posting on blogs/forums to obtain backlinks or using automated backlinking software, isn&#039;t that also spamming to manipulate search engine results?

What is the difference? It all violates Google&#039;s TOS.

There is also a silly mindset that whitehat SEO is risk free and blackhat is full of risks. Really? How many whitehat sites, that supposedly conformed to all of Google&#039;s TOS, suddenly lose their ranking and all their business when Google decides to do a major algorithm update? Ha! Where is the reward for loyalty from Google?

So does &quot;blackhat&quot; or being &quot;unethical&quot; really exist anymore? Isn&#039;t this really about traffic, conversions and surviving within an ever tightening monopoly created by Google for which we now are left with few other options, unless to line the pockets of Google shareholders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most link building by most SEO firms is not &#8220;natural&#8221; and is in fact blackhat according to Google. If you have to pay for it, ask for it, comment for it or insert a link in your article to gain it, then you are manipulating Google search results and Google terms that as blackhat. You just need to view the many video&#8217;s by Matt Cutts to realize that if you are doing any of the above, then you are creating links manually and violating Google&#8217;s TOS.</p>
<p>It simply baffles me how many SEO experts will quickly denounce Cloaking as &#8220;unethical&#8221; or against Google&#8217;s TOS or even label it as spam which manipulates search results but then on a daily basis create artificial, manual or software generated backlinks for clients.</p>
<p>If you are distributing countless articles with links or posting on blogs/forums to obtain backlinks or using automated backlinking software, isn&#8217;t that also spamming to manipulate search engine results?</p>
<p>What is the difference? It all violates Google&#8217;s TOS.</p>
<p>There is also a silly mindset that whitehat SEO is risk free and blackhat is full of risks. Really? How many whitehat sites, that supposedly conformed to all of Google&#8217;s TOS, suddenly lose their ranking and all their business when Google decides to do a major algorithm update? Ha! Where is the reward for loyalty from Google?</p>
<p>So does &#8220;blackhat&#8221; or being &#8220;unethical&#8221; really exist anymore? Isn&#8217;t this really about traffic, conversions and surviving within an ever tightening monopoly created by Google for which we now are left with few other options, unless to line the pockets of Google shareholders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Community Links #2 - White Hat SEO Vs. Black Hat SEO, How to Deal with Pagination &#38; Duplicate Content Issues and More..</title>
		<link>http://www.benh.org/blog/2007/05/white-hat-seo-vs-black-hat-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-4419</link>
		<dc:creator>Community Links #2 - White Hat SEO Vs. Black Hat SEO, How to Deal with Pagination &#38; Duplicate Content Issues and More..</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 23:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benh.org/blog/2007/05/white-hat-seo-vs-black-hat-seo/#comment-4419</guid>
		<description>[...] - Benedict Herold shows us the difference between White Hat SEO Vs. Black Hat SEO [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; Benedict Herold shows us the difference between White Hat SEO Vs. Black Hat SEO [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benedict herold</title>
		<link>http://www.benh.org/blog/2007/05/white-hat-seo-vs-black-hat-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-4095</link>
		<dc:creator>benedict herold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 04:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benh.org/blog/2007/05/white-hat-seo-vs-black-hat-seo/#comment-4095</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comments Vijay and Ajay. Nice to hear you guys are wearing White hat too.

Content is King, this is the thumb rule; This is important key in White Hat SEO. 

Anyhow lately few content authors have tried few Black Hat SEO to gain popularity within short period and it will last only for short period anyway.!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments Vijay and Ajay. Nice to hear you guys are wearing White hat too.</p>
<p>Content is King, this is the thumb rule; This is important key in White Hat SEO. </p>
<p>Anyhow lately few content authors have tried few Black Hat SEO to gain popularity within short period and it will last only for short period anyway.!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajay</title>
		<link>http://www.benh.org/blog/2007/05/white-hat-seo-vs-black-hat-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-4086</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 15:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benh.org/blog/2007/05/white-hat-seo-vs-black-hat-seo/#comment-4086</guid>
		<description>Actually, I never really bothered much about SEO. I just did what was needed and blogged what I had to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I never really bothered much about SEO. I just did what was needed and blogged what I had to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vijay</title>
		<link>http://www.benh.org/blog/2007/05/white-hat-seo-vs-black-hat-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-4083</link>
		<dc:creator>Vijay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 14:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.benh.org/blog/2007/05/white-hat-seo-vs-black-hat-seo/#comment-4083</guid>
		<description>It is always advised to be an advocate of White Hat SEO. Blackhat is for those sites who want to be popular for a short period of time and then disappear altogether. Nothing beats gradual and solid link building.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is always advised to be an advocate of White Hat SEO. Blackhat is for those sites who want to be popular for a short period of time and then disappear altogether. Nothing beats gradual and solid link building.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

